AMD Radeon R7 250
VS
AMD Radeon R7 350
AMD Radeon R7 250
VS
AMD Radeon R7 350

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon R7 250 and AMD Radeon R7 350. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

599
Place in performance rating
not rated
22.79
Value for money (0-100)
0.08
GCN
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Oland
Code name
Cape Verde
Desktop
Type
Desktop
1 October 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
6 July 2016 (5 years ago)
$89
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$117 (1.3x MSRP)
Price now
$12.88
reference
Design
no data
1.00
Value for money
no data
Oland XT
GPU code name
Cape Verde
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon R7 250 and AMD Radeon R7 350 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

384
Pipelines
512
no data
Core clock speed
800 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
950 million
Transistor count
1,500 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
75 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
25.20
Texture fill rate
25.60
716.8 gflops
Floating-point performance
819.2 gflops
384
Pipelines / CUDA cores
512
1050 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
950 million
Number of transistors
1,500 million
75 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
55 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon R7 250 and AMD Radeon R7 350.

PCIe 3.0 x8
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
168 mm
Length
168 mm
N/A
Supplementary power connectors
None
PCIe 3.0
Bus support
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon R7 250 and AMD Radeon R7 350 can be seen in this section.

DDR3, GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1150 MHz
Memory clock speed
4500 MHz
72 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon R7 250 and AMD Radeon R7 350, the size and number of monitors.

1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
+
HDMI
+
-
DisplayPort support
no data

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon R7 250 and AMD Radeon R7 350 is the additional functionality.

+
AppAcceleration
no data
1
CrossFire
no data
1
FreeSync
no data
-
HD3D
no data
-
PowerTune
no data
-
TrueAudio
no data
-
ZeroCore
no data
+
DDMA audio
no data
-
Enduro
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon R7 250 and AMD Radeon R7 350. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX® 12
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
5.1
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data
-
Mantle
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R7 250 and AMD Radeon R7 350 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R7 250 or AMD Radeon R7 350 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R7 250
AMD Radeon R7 350
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R7 250
AMD Radeon R7 350
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R7 250
AMD Radeon R7 350
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R7 250
AMD Radeon R7 350
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R7 250
AMD Radeon R7 350
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250

5.51% faster in synthetic tests

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 350

Cheaper ($12.88 vs $117 (1.3x MSRP))

More pipelines (512 vs 384)

Less power consumption (55 Watt vs 75 Watt)

So, AMD Radeon R7 250 or AMD Radeon R7 350?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R7 250 .

AMD Radeon R7 250 versus AMD Radeon R7 350 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R7 250
5.0 Out of 1 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R7 350