Intel Iris Graphics 5100
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
Intel Iris Graphics 5100
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Intel Iris Graphics 5100 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

569
Place in performance rating
637
no data
Value for money (0-100)
8.17
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Architecture
Kepler
Haswell GT3
Code name
GK107
Laptop
Type
Mobile workstation
5 June 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
1 June 2012 (9 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$265.27
$696
Price now
$92 (0.3x MSRP)
0.19
Value for money
0.28
Haswell GT3
GPU code name
N14P-Q3
Laptop
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between Intel Iris Graphics 5100 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

320
Pipelines
384
200 MHz
Core clock speed
745 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
1,300 million
Transistor count
1,270 million
22 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
30 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
48.00
Texture fill rate
23.84
no data
Floating-point performance
572.2 gflops
40
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
1200 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
1,300 million
Number of transistors
1,270 million
30 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
55 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the Intel Iris Graphics 5100 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
no data
Laptop size
medium sized

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics Intel Iris Graphics 5100 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M can be seen in this section.

System Shared
Memory type
DDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
64/128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
+
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards Intel Iris Graphics 5100 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between Intel Iris Graphics 5100 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M is the additional functionality.

no data
CUDA
+
no data
Optimus
+
+
Quick Sync
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is Intel Iris Graphics 5100 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1.80
Vulkan
+
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
1.2
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel Iris Graphics 5100 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel Iris Graphics 5100 or NVIDIA Quadro K2000M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel Iris Graphics 5100
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
Death Stranding (2020) Intel Iris Graphics 5100
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
F1 2020 (2020) Intel Iris Graphics 5100
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel Iris Graphics 5100
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel Iris Graphics 5100
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of Intel Iris Graphics 5100

Finer manufacturing process technology (22 nm vs 28 nm)

Less power consumption (30 Watt vs 55 Watt)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

0.21% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($92 (0.3x MSRP) vs $696)

More pipelines (384 vs 320)

So, Intel Iris Graphics 5100 or NVIDIA Quadro K2000M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro K2000M .

Intel Iris Graphics 5100 versus NVIDIA Quadro K2000M performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Intel Iris Graphics 5100
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro K2000M