NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro K2000M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

637
Place in performance rating
976
8.17
Value for money (0-100)
10.45
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
GK107
Code name
GF108
Mobile workstation
Type
Laptop
1 June 2012 (9 years ago)
Release date
5 January 2011 (10 years ago)
$265.27
Launch price (MSRP)
$59.99
$92 (0.3x MSRP)
Price now
$237 (4x MSRP)
0.28
Value for money
0.02
N14P-Q3
GPU code name
N12P-GP/LV
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro K2000M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

384
Pipelines
48
745 MHz
Core clock speed
740 / 600 MHz
1,270 million
Transistor count
585 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
55 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
12 Watt
23.84
Texture fill rate
5.9 billion/sec
572.2 gflops
Floating-point performance
129.02 gflops
no data
CUDA cores
48
384
Pipelines / CUDA cores
48
1,270 million
Number of transistors
585 million
55 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
12 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro K2000M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M.

MXM-A (3.0)
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
medium sized
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro K2000M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M can be seen in this section.

DDR3
Memory type
DDR3
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
1536 MB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
1800 MHz
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
28.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
12.8 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro K2000M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro K2000M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M is the additional functionality.

+
CUDA
+
+
Optimus
+
no data
Verde Drivers
+
no data
DirectCompute
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro K2000M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 API
4.6
OpenGL
4.5
+
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
1.2
OpenCL
1.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro K2000M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro K2000M or NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

3.5% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($92 (0.3x MSRP) vs $237 (4x MSRP))

More pipelines (384 vs 48)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

More memory bandwidth (28.8 GB/s vs 12.8 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M

Less power consumption (12 Watt vs 55 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (1536 MB vs 2 GB)

So, NVIDIA Quadro K2000M or NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro K2000M .

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M