AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

608
Place in performance rating
637
no data
Value for money (0-100)
8.17
Vega
Architecture
Kepler
Vega Raven Ridge
Code name
GK107
Laptop
Type
Mobile workstation
7 January 2018 (3 years ago)
Release date
1 June 2012 (9 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$265.27
$371
Price now
$92 (0.3x MSRP)
2.48
Value for money
0.28
Vega Raven Ridge
GPU code name
N14P-Q3
Laptop
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

192
Pipelines
384
no data
Core clock speed
745 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
no data
Transistor count
1,270 million
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
12.13
Texture fill rate
23.84
no data
Floating-point performance
572.2 gflops
192
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
1000 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
4,940 million
Number of transistors
1,270 million
15 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
55 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M.

IGP
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data
no data
Laptop size
medium sized

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M can be seen in this section.

System Shared
Memory type
DDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
no data
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M is the additional functionality.

no data
CUDA
+
no data
Optimus
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX 12_1
DirectX
12 (11_0)
no data
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
+
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 or NVIDIA Quadro K2000M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 25.4 7.9
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 13.1
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

0.55% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Cheaper ($92 (0.3x MSRP) vs $371)

More pipelines (384 vs 192)

So, AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 or NVIDIA Quadro K2000M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 .

AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 versus NVIDIA Quadro K2000M performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro K2000M