ATI FireGL V7300
VS
AMD Radeon R5 M240
ATI FireGL V7300
VS
AMD Radeon R5 M240

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards ATI FireGL V7300 and AMD Radeon R5 M240. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

2162
Place in performance rating
901
0.27
Value for money (0-100)
no data
R500
Architecture
GCN
R520
Code name
Jet
Workstation
Type
Laptop
1 October 2005
Release date
1 September 2014 (7 years ago)
$1,599
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$99
Price now
no data
no data
GPU code name
Jet XT / Sun
no data
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between ATI FireGL V7300 and AMD Radeon R5 M240 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

no data
Pipelines
320
594 MHz
Core clock speed
1030 MHz
321 million
Transistor count
690 million
90 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
97 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
9.504
Texture fill rate
20.60
no data
Floating-point performance
659.2 gflops
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
320
no data
Number of transistors
690 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the ATI FireGL V7300 and AMD Radeon R5 M240.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
229 mm
Length
no data
1x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
no data
no data
Bus support
Not Listed

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics ATI FireGL V7300 and AMD Radeon R5 M240 can be seen in this section.

GDDR3
Memory type
Not Listed
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
256 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
1296 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
41.47 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards ATI FireGL V7300 and AMD Radeon R5 M240, the size and number of monitors.

2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
Eyefinity
+

Technologies

The difference between ATI FireGL V7300 and AMD Radeon R5 M240 is the additional functionality.

no data
AppAcceleration
+
no data
HD3D
+
no data
PowerTune
+
no data
TrueAudio
-
no data
ZeroCore
+
no data
Enduro
-
no data
DualGraphics
1
no data
Switchable graphics
1
no data
PowerPlay
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is ATI FireGL V7300 and AMD Radeon R5 M240. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
DirectX® 11
2.0
OpenGL
4.4
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
Not Listed
no data
Mantle
+

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for ATI FireGL V7300 and AMD Radeon R5 M240 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the ATI FireGL V7300 or AMD Radeon R5 M240 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) ATI FireGL V7300
AMD Radeon R5 M240
Death Stranding (2020) ATI FireGL V7300
AMD Radeon R5 M240
F1 2020 (2020) ATI FireGL V7300
AMD Radeon R5 M240
Gears Tactics (2020) ATI FireGL V7300
AMD Radeon R5 M240
Doom Eternal (2020) ATI FireGL V7300
AMD Radeon R5 M240
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of ATI FireGL V7300

More memory bandwidth (41.47 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 M240

2.13% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 90 nm)

So, ATI FireGL V7300 or AMD Radeon R5 M240?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R5 M240 .

ATI FireGL V7300 versus AMD Radeon R5 M240 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score ATI FireGL V7300
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R5 M240