ATI FireGL V7300
VS
AMD Radeon R9 295X2
ATI FireGL V7300
VS
AMD Radeon R9 295X2

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards ATI FireGL V7300 and AMD Radeon R9 295X2. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

2162
Place in performance rating
160
0.27
Value for money (0-100)
19.19
R500
Architecture
GCN 2.0
R520
Code name
Vesuvius
Workstation
Type
Desktop
1 October 2005
Release date
29 April 2014 (7 years ago)
$1,599
Launch price (MSRP)
$1,499
$99
Price now
$600 (0.4x MSRP)
no data
Design
reference
no data
Value for money
11.84
no data
GPU code name
Vesuvius
no data
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between ATI FireGL V7300 and AMD Radeon R9 295X2 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

no data
Pipelines
2816
594 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
no data
Boost Clock
1018 MHz
321 million
Transistor count
6,200 million
90 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
97 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
500 Watt
9.504
Texture fill rate
179.2
no data
Floating-point performance
2x 5,733 gflops
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
2816
no data
Boost clock speed
1018 MHz
no data
Number of transistors
6,200 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
500 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the ATI FireGL V7300 and AMD Radeon R9 295X2.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
229 mm
Length
307 mm
1x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
2 x 8-pin
no data
Bus support
PCIe 2.1 x16

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics ATI FireGL V7300 and AMD Radeon R9 295X2 can be seen in this section.

GDDR3
Memory type
GDDR5
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
512 Bit
1296 MHz
Memory clock speed
1250 MHz
41.47 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
640 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards ATI FireGL V7300 and AMD Radeon R9 295X2, the size and number of monitors.

2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort
no data
Eyefinity
1
no data
HDMI
+
no data
DisplayPort support
-

Technologies

The difference between ATI FireGL V7300 and AMD Radeon R9 295X2 is the additional functionality.

no data
AppAcceleration
-
no data
CrossFire
1
no data
FreeSync
1
no data
HD3D
+
no data
LiquidVR
1
no data
PowerTune
-
no data
TressFX
1
no data
TrueAudio
-
no data
ZeroCore
-
no data
DDMA audio
+
no data
Enduro
-
no data
UVD
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is ATI FireGL V7300 and AMD Radeon R9 295X2. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
DirectX® 12
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
+
no data
Shader Model
6.3
no data
OpenCL
2.0
no data
Mantle
-

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for ATI FireGL V7300 and AMD Radeon R9 295X2 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the ATI FireGL V7300 or AMD Radeon R9 295X2 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) ATI FireGL V7300
AMD Radeon R9 295X2
Death Stranding (2020) ATI FireGL V7300
AMD Radeon R9 295X2
F1 2020 (2020) ATI FireGL V7300
AMD Radeon R9 295X2
Gears Tactics (2020) ATI FireGL V7300
AMD Radeon R9 295X2
Doom Eternal (2020) ATI FireGL V7300
AMD Radeon R9 295X2
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of ATI FireGL V7300

Cheaper ($99 vs $600 (0.4x MSRP))

Less power consumption (97 Watt vs 500 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 8 GB)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2

38.67% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 90 nm)

More memory bandwidth (640 GB/s vs 41.47 GB/s)

So, ATI FireGL V7300 or AMD Radeon R9 295X2?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R9 295X2 .

ATI FireGL V7300 versus AMD Radeon R9 295X2 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score ATI FireGL V7300
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R9 295X2