AMD Cedar
VS
AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
AMD Cedar
VS
AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Cedar and AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema). Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
935
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.1
Cedar
Code name
Beema/Mullins
Desktop
Type
Laptop
no data
Release date
29 April 2014 (7 years ago)
$17.81
Price now
no data
Cedar
GPU code name
Beema/Mullins
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Cedar and AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

80
Pipelines
128
no data
Core clock speed
350 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
686 MHz
292 million
Transistor count
no data
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
80
Pipelines / CUDA cores
128
no data
Boost clock speed
686 MHz
292 million
Number of transistors
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Cedar and AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema). Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.0
4.4
OpenGL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cedar and AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cedar or AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cedar
AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cedar

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)

2.01% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (128 vs 80)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Cedar or AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) .

AMD Cedar versus AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Cedar
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)