NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
VS
AMD Cedar
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
VS
AMD Cedar

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M and AMD Cedar. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

828
Place in performance rating
not rated
Fermi
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GF116
Code name
Cedar
Laptop
Type
Desktop
6 December 2011 (10 years ago)
Release date
no data
$55
Price now
$17.81
0.26
Value for money
no data
N13E-GE2
GPU code name
Cedar
Laptop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M and AMD Cedar based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

144
Pipelines
80
753 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
1,170 million
Transistor count
292 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
35 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
253.4 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
Up to 144
CUDA cores
no data
144
Pipelines / CUDA cores
80
753 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
1,170 million
Number of transistors
292 million
35 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M and AMD Cedar.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
no data
large
Laptop size
no data
PCI Express 2.0
Bus support
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M and AMD Cedar can be seen in this section.

DDR3
Memory type
no data
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
1800 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M and AMD Cedar, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
no data
+
HDCP
no data
Up to 2048x1536
Maximum VGA resolution
no data
+
HDMI
no data

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M and AMD Cedar is the additional functionality.

+
3D Vision
no data
+
CUDA
no data
+
Optimus
no data
+
3D Blu-Ray
no data
DirectX 11
DirectX 11
no data
+
DirectCompute
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M and AMD Cedar. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 API
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.5
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
Vulkan
no data
5.1
Shader Model
no data
1.1
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M and AMD Cedar graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M or AMD Cedar good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
AMD Cedar
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
AMD Cedar
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
AMD Cedar
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
AMD Cedar
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
AMD Cedar
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M

3.63% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (144 vs 80)

Advantages of AMD Cedar

Cheaper ($17.81 vs $55)

So, NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M or AMD Cedar?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M .

NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M versus AMD Cedar performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Cedar