Qualcomm Adreno 685
VS
G92
Qualcomm Adreno 685
VS
G92

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Qualcomm Adreno 685 and G92. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

687
Place in performance rating
not rated
no data
Architecture
Tesla
6 December 2018 (3 years ago)
Release date
no data
$1429
Price now
$36
0.58
Value for money
no data
no data
GPU code name
G92
Laptop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between Qualcomm Adreno 685 and G92 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

7 nm
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
128
no data
Number of transistors
754 million

Technologies

The difference between Qualcomm Adreno 685 and G92 is the additional functionality.

no data
CUDA
1.1

API support

The difference in supported APIs is Qualcomm Adreno 685 and G92. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX 12
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
no data
OpenGL
3.3
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
Shader Model
4.0
no data
OpenCL
1.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Qualcomm Adreno 685 and G92 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Qualcomm Adreno 685 or G92 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
G92
Death Stranding (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
G92
F1 2020 (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
G92
Gears Tactics (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
G92
Doom Eternal (2020) Qualcomm Adreno 685
G92
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of Qualcomm Adreno 685

4.32% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (7 nm vs 65 nm)

Advantages of G92

Cheaper ($36 vs $1429)

So, Qualcomm Adreno 685 or G92?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Qualcomm Adreno 685 .

Qualcomm Adreno 685 versus G92 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

-1%

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Qualcomm Adreno 685
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score G92