NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
VS
AMD FirePro M4000
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
VS
AMD FirePro M4000

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro K3000M and AMD FirePro M4000. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

515
Place in performance rating
524
11.89
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Kepler
Architecture
GCN
GK104
Code name
Chelsea
Mobile workstation
Type
Mobile workstation
1 June 2012 (9 years ago)
Release date
1 July 2012 (9 years ago)
$155
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$223 (1.4x MSRP)
Price now
$433
1.34
Value for money
0.64
N14E-Q1
GPU code name
Cape Verde GLM
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro K3000M and AMD FirePro M4000 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

576
Pipelines
512
654 MHz
Core clock speed
600 MHz
3,540 million
Transistor count
1,500 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
75 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
31.39
Texture fill rate
21.60
753.4 gflops
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
576
Pipelines / CUDA cores
512
3,540 million
Number of transistors
1,500 million
75 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
33 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M and AMD FirePro M4000.

MXM-B (3.0)
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
large
Laptop size
medium sized
no data
Bus support
n/a
no data
Form factor
MXM-A

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro K3000M and AMD FirePro M4000 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
2800 MHz
Memory clock speed
4500 MHz
89.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro K3000M and AMD FirePro M4000, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
StereoOutput3D
1

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro K3000M and AMD FirePro M4000 is the additional functionality.

+
CUDA
no data
+
Optimus
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro K3000M and AMD FirePro M4000. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan
no data
5.1
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro K3000M and AMD FirePro M4000 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M or AMD FirePro M4000 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
AMD FirePro M4000
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
AMD FirePro M4000
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
AMD FirePro M4000
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
AMD FirePro M4000
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
AMD FirePro M4000
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

Cheaper ($223 (1.4x MSRP) vs $433)

More pipelines (576 vs 512)

More maximum RAM amount (4 GB vs 1 GB)

More memory bandwidth (89.6 GB/s vs 72 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD FirePro M4000

0.21% faster in synthetic tests

Less power consumption (33 Watt vs 75 Watt)

So, NVIDIA Quadro K3000M or AMD FirePro M4000?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FirePro M4000 .

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M versus AMD FirePro M4000 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FirePro M4000