NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro P520
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro P520

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro K3000M and NVIDIA Quadro P520. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

515
Place in performance rating
454
11.89
Value for money (0-100)
1.66
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
GK104
Code name
no data
Mobile workstation
Type
Mobile workstation
1 June 2012 (9 years ago)
Release date
27 May 2019 (2 years ago)
$155
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$223 (1.4x MSRP)
Price now
$1670
1.34
Value for money
1.94
N14E-Q1
GPU code name
GP108
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro K3000M and NVIDIA Quadro P520 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

576
Pipelines
384
654 MHz
Core clock speed
1303 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
3,540 million
Transistor count
no data
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
75 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
31.39
Texture fill rate
35.83
753.4 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
576
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
no data
Boost clock speed
1493 MHz
3,540 million
Number of transistors
1,800 million
75 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
18 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M and NVIDIA Quadro P520.

MXM-B (3.0)
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
large
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro K3000M and NVIDIA Quadro P520 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
2800 MHz
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
89.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
48.06 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro K3000M and NVIDIA Quadro P520, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro K3000M and NVIDIA Quadro P520 is the additional functionality.

no data
Multi Monitor
+
+
CUDA
no data
+
Optimus
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro K3000M and NVIDIA Quadro P520. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (11_0)
DirectX
DirectX 12_1
4.6
OpenGL
no data
+
Vulkan
+
5.1
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro K3000M and NVIDIA Quadro P520 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M or NVIDIA Quadro P520 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
NVIDIA Quadro P520
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
NVIDIA Quadro P520
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
NVIDIA Quadro P520
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
NVIDIA Quadro P520
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
NVIDIA Quadro P520
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

Cheaper ($223 (1.4x MSRP) vs $1670)

More pipelines (576 vs 384)

More maximum RAM amount (4 GB vs 2 GB)

More memory bandwidth (89.6 GB/s vs 48.06 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P520

2.64% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

Multi Monitor

So, NVIDIA Quadro K3000M or NVIDIA Quadro P520?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro P520 .

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M versus NVIDIA Quadro P520 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro P520