NVIDIA Quadro K3000M - Specs & Benchmarks

Detailed Review of the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

Ranked 442 in CpusData's performance ranking, the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M delivers exceptional graphics capabilities tailored for gamers and professionals alike.

Manufacturer: NVIDIA
Year of Manufacture: 2012
Process Technology: 28 nm
Power Consumption: 75 Watt (TDP)

Performance Specifications

The NVIDIA Quadro K3000M operates at a base clock frequency of 654 MHz, with the potential to overclock up to . This card is equipped with 4 GB of high-speed memory, featuring a clock rate of 2800 MHz and an impressive memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Key Features and Compatibility

In this section, we explore the technologies integrated into the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M, including:

Supported Technologies - A comprehensive overview of the advanced technologies utilized in the card to enhance performance and visual fidelity.
Interfaces - A detailed list of available interfaces for connectivity, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of displays and peripherals.
Motherboard Compatibility - Insights into which motherboard configurations are best suited for optimal performance with the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M.

Performance NVIDIA Quadro K3000M in Popular Games

We present test results showcasing the performance of the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M in several popular titles. This data allows potential buyers to gauge how well this graphics card handles various gaming scenarios, ensuring it meets their expectations.

Comparison Tools

For further insights, you can also compare your NVIDIA Quadro K3000M graphics card with other models directly on our site. This feature provides a valuable resource for making informed decisions tailored to your specific needs.

Place in performance rating:		515
Value for money (0-100):		11.89
Architecture:		Kepler
Code name:		GK104
Type:		Mobile workstation
Release date:		1 June 2012 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP):		$155
Price now:		$223 (1.4x MSRP)
Value for money:		1.34
GPU code name:		N14E-Q1
Market segment:		Mobile workstation

Pipelines:		576
Core clock speed:		654 MHz
Transistor count:		3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology:		28 nm
Power consumption (TDP):		75 Watt
Texture fill rate:		31.39
Floating-point performance:		753.4 gflops
Pipelines / CUDA cores:		576
Number of transistors:		3,540 million
Thermal design power (TDP):		75 Watt

Interface:		MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size:		large

Memory type:		GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount:		4 GB
Memory bus width:		256 Bit
Memory clock speed:		2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth:		89.6 GB/s
Shared memory:		-

DirectX:		12 (11_0)
OpenGL:		4.6
Vulkan:		+
Shader Model:		5.1
OpenCL:		1.2

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M review. Specs and Benchmarks

Detailed Review of the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

Performance Specifications

Key Features and Compatibility

Performance NVIDIA Quadro K3000M in Popular Games

Comparison Tools

General info

Technical specs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Memory

Video outputs and ports

Technologies

API support

Overall gaming performance

AMD equivalent

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M in Benchmarks

Overall benchmark performance

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark Vantage Performance

Passmark

Octane Render OctaneBench

Legend
5	Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
	May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30	Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40	Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60	Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
	May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
?	Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
	Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

CUDA:		+
Optimus:		+