NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
VS
AMD FirePro M2000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
VS
AMD FirePro M2000

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M and AMD FirePro M2000. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

959
Place in performance rating
915
3.50
Value for money (0-100)
no data
G7x
Architecture
Terascale 2
G71
Code name
Turks
Mobile workstation
Type
Mobile workstation
1 March 2007 (14 years ago)
Release date
1 July 2012 (9 years ago)
$99.99
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$69 (0.7x MSRP)
Price now
$387
0.11
Value for money
0.03
G71GLM
GPU code name
Turks GLM
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M and AMD FirePro M2000 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

32
Pipelines
480
8 MHz
Core clock speed
500 MHz
575 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
278 million
Transistor count
716 million
90 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
45 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
13.80
Texture fill rate
12.00
no data
Floating-point performance
480.0 gflops
32
Pipelines / CUDA cores
480
575 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
278 million
Number of transistors
716 million
45 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
33 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M and AMD FirePro M2000.

MXM-III
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
large
Laptop size
medium sized
no data
Bus support
n/a
no data
Form factor
chip-down

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M and AMD FirePro M2000 can be seen in this section.

GDDR3
Memory type
GDDR5
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
1200 MHz
Memory clock speed
3200 MHz
38.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
25.6 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M and AMD FirePro M2000, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
StereoOutput3D
1

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M and AMD FirePro M2000. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M and AMD FirePro M2000 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M or AMD FirePro M2000 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
AMD FirePro M2000
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
AMD FirePro M2000
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
AMD FirePro M2000
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
AMD FirePro M2000
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
AMD FirePro M2000
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

Cheaper ($69 (0.7x MSRP) vs $387)

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 1 GB)

More memory bandwidth (38.4 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD FirePro M2000

0.16% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (480 vs 32)

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 90 nm)

Less power consumption (33 Watt vs 45 Watt)

So, NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M or AMD FirePro M2000?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FirePro M2000 .

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M versus AMD FirePro M2000 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FirePro M2000