NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
VS
AMD FirePro V7900 SDI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
VS
AMD FirePro V7900 SDI

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and AMD FirePro V7900 SDI. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

228
Place in performance rating
1838
no data
Value for money (0-100)
0.17
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TU117
Code name
Cayman
Laptop
Type
Workstation
23 April 2019 (2 years ago)
Release date
24 May 2011
$1185
Price now
$160
5.95
Value for money
no data
N18P-G0 / N18P-G61
GPU code name
no data
Laptop
Market segment
no data

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and AMD FirePro V7900 SDI based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1024
Pipelines
1280
1020 MHz
Core clock speed
725 MHz
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
4,700 million
Transistor count
2,640 million
12 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
30 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
224 Watt
72.00
Texture fill rate
58.00
no data
Floating-point performance
1,856.0 gflops
1024
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
1245 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
4,700 million
Number of transistors
no data
30 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and AMD FirePro V7900 SDI.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
279 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
medium sized
Laptop size
no data
no data
Bus support
PCIe 2.1 x16
no data
Form factor
full height / full length

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and AMD FirePro V7900 SDI can be seen in this section.

GDDR5, GDDR6
Memory type
GDDR5
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
8000 MHz
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
112.1 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and AMD FirePro V7900 SDI, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
4x SDI
no data
StereoOutput3D
+
no data
Dual-link DVI support
+
no data
DisplayPort count
4

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and AMD FirePro V7900 SDI. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and AMD FirePro V7900 SDI graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q or AMD FirePro V7900 SDI good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
AMD FirePro V7900 SDI
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
AMD FirePro V7900 SDI
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
AMD FirePro V7900 SDI
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
AMD FirePro V7900 SDI
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
AMD FirePro V7900 SDI
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

26.76% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 40 nm)

Less power consumption (30 Watt vs 224 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (4 GB vs 2 GB)

Advantages of AMD FirePro V7900 SDI

Cheaper ($160 vs $1185)

More pipelines (1280 vs 1024)

More memory bandwidth (160 GB/s vs 112.1 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q or AMD FirePro V7900 SDI?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q .

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q versus AMD FirePro V7900 SDI performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FirePro V7900 SDI