Intel Iris Graphics 550
VS
AMD FirePro W4190M
Intel Iris Graphics 550
VS
AMD FirePro W4190M

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Intel Iris Graphics 550 and AMD FirePro W4190M. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

419
Place in performance rating
617
Gen. 9 Skylake
Architecture
GCN
Skylake GT3e
Code name
Opal
Laptop
Type
Mobile workstation
1 September 2015 (6 years ago)
Release date
12 November 2015 (6 years ago)
no data
Price now
$4205
no data
Value for money
0.16
Skylake GT3e
GPU code name
Mars XTX?
Laptop
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between Intel Iris Graphics 550 and AMD FirePro W4190M based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

384
Pipelines
384
300 MHz
Core clock speed
825 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
189 million
Transistor count
950 million
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
15 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
52.80
Texture fill rate
21.60
no data
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
48
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
1100 MHz
Boost clock speed
900 MHz
189 million
Number of transistors
950 million
15 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the Intel Iris Graphics 550 and AMD FirePro W4190M.

PCIe 3.0 x1
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Laptop size
medium sized

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics Intel Iris Graphics 550 and AMD FirePro W4190M can be seen in this section.

eDRAM
Memory type
GDDR5
64 MB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
no data
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
+
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards Intel Iris Graphics 550 and AMD FirePro W4190M, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between Intel Iris Graphics 550 and AMD FirePro W4190M is the additional functionality.

no data
AppAcceleration
+
no data
Enduro
+
+
Quick Sync
no data
no data
PowerPlay
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is Intel Iris Graphics 550 and AMD FirePro W4190M. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1.97
Vulkan
1.2.131
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
2.1
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel Iris Graphics 550 and AMD FirePro W4190M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel Iris Graphics 550 or AMD FirePro W4190M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel Iris Graphics 550
AMD FirePro W4190M
Death Stranding (2020) Intel Iris Graphics 550
AMD FirePro W4190M
F1 2020 (2020) Intel Iris Graphics 550
AMD FirePro W4190M
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel Iris Graphics 550
AMD FirePro W4190M
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel Iris Graphics 550
AMD FirePro W4190M
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of Intel Iris Graphics 550

4.68% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (64 MB vs 2 GB)

Advantages of AMD FirePro W4190M

There is no accountable advantage

So, Intel Iris Graphics 550 or AMD FirePro W4190M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel Iris Graphics 550 .

Intel Iris Graphics 550 versus AMD FirePro W4190M performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Intel Iris Graphics 550
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FirePro W4190M