NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
VS
AMD FirePro W4190M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
VS
AMD FirePro W4190M

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and AMD FirePro W4190M. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

20
Place in performance rating
617
Turing
Architecture
GCN
TU106
Code name
Opal
Mobile workstation
Type
Mobile workstation
27 May 2019 (2 years ago)
Release date
12 November 2015 (6 years ago)
$2393
Price now
$4205
16.65
Value for money
0.16
N19E-Q1
GPU code name
Mars XTX?
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and AMD FirePro W4190M based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

2304
Pipelines
384
945 MHz
Core clock speed
825 MHz
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
10,800 million
Transistor count
950 million
12 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
80 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
198.7
Texture fill rate
21.60
no data
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
1920
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
1380 MHz
Boost clock speed
900 MHz
10,800 million
Number of transistors
950 million
80 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and AMD FirePro W4190M.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
large
Laptop size
medium sized

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and AMD FirePro W4190M can be seen in this section.

GDDR6
Memory type
GDDR5
6 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
192 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
14000 MHz
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
448.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and AMD FirePro W4190M, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs
+
G-SYNC support
no data

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and AMD FirePro W4190M is the additional functionality.

+
VR Ready
no data
+
Multi Monitor
no data
7.5
CUDA
no data
no data
AppAcceleration
+
no data
Enduro
+
no data
PowerPlay
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and AMD FirePro W4190M. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 Ultimate (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2.131
Vulkan
1.2.131
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
1.2
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and AMD FirePro W4190M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile or AMD FirePro W4190M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
AMD FirePro W4190M
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
AMD FirePro W4190M
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
AMD FirePro W4190M
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
AMD FirePro W4190M
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
AMD FirePro W4190M
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

76.04% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($2393 vs $4205)

More pipelines (2304 vs 384)

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 28 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (6 GB vs 2 GB)

More memory bandwidth (448.0 GB/s vs 64 GB/s)

G-SYNC support

VR Ready

Multi Monitor

Advantages of AMD FirePro W4190M

There is no accountable advantage

So, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile or AMD FirePro W4190M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile .

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile versus AMD FirePro W4190M performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FirePro W4190M