AMD FirePro W9100
VS
Qualcomm Adreno 680
AMD FirePro W9100
VS
Qualcomm Adreno 680

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD FirePro W9100 and Qualcomm Adreno 680. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

179
Place in performance rating
686
4.11
Value for money (0-100)
no data
GCN 2.0
Architecture
no data
Hawaii
Code name
no data
Workstation
Type
Laptop
26 March 2014 (7 years ago)
Release date
6 December 2018 (3 years ago)
$1694
Price now
no data
4.51
Value for money
no data
Hawaii
GPU code name
no data
Workstation
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD FirePro W9100 and Qualcomm Adreno 680 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

2816
Pipelines
no data
930 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
6,200 million
Transistor count
no data
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
7 nm
750 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
163.7
Texture fill rate
no data
5,238 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
2816
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
6,200 million
Number of transistors
no data
750 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD FirePro W9100 and Qualcomm Adreno 680.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
no data
275 mm
Length
no data
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
no data
PCIe 3.0
Bus support
no data
full height / full length
Form factor
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD FirePro W9100 and Qualcomm Adreno 680 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
no data
16 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
512 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
5000 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
320 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
no data
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD FirePro W9100 and Qualcomm Adreno 680, the size and number of monitors.

6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
no data
1
StereoOutput3D
no data
1
Dual-link DVI support
no data
1
HD сomponent video output
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD FirePro W9100 and Qualcomm Adreno 680. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_0)
DirectX
DirectX 12
4.6
OpenGL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD FirePro W9100 and Qualcomm Adreno 680 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD FirePro W9100 or Qualcomm Adreno 680 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD FirePro W9100
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Death Stranding (2020) AMD FirePro W9100
Qualcomm Adreno 680
F1 2020 (2020) AMD FirePro W9100
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD FirePro W9100
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD FirePro W9100
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD FirePro W9100

32.7% faster in synthetic tests

Advantages of Qualcomm Adreno 680

Finer manufacturing process technology (7 nm vs 28 nm)

So, AMD FirePro W9100 or Qualcomm Adreno 680?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FirePro W9100 .

AMD FirePro W9100 versus Qualcomm Adreno 680 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FirePro W9100
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Qualcomm Adreno 680