Riva TNT2 M64 vs Matrox G450

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Riva TNT2 M64 and Matrox G450. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated

Place in performance rating

not rated

Fahrenheit

Architecture

G400

12 October 1999 (22 years ago)

Release date

1 January 2001 (20 years ago)

no data

Price now

$39

NV5 B6

GPU code name

Condor

Desktop

Market segment

Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between Riva TNT2 M64 and Matrox G450 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

125 MHz

Core clock speed

125 MHz

250 nm

Manufacturing process technology

180 nm

0.25

Texture fill rate

0.25

15 million

Number of transistors

10 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the Riva TNT2 M64 and Matrox G450.

AGP 4x

Interface

PCI

no data

Length

150 mm

None

Supplementary power connectors

None

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics Riva TNT2 M64 and Matrox G450 can be seen in this section.

SDR

Memory type

DDR

16 MB

Maximum RAM amount

32 MB

64 Bit

Memory bus width

64 Bit

143 MHz

Memory clock speed

332 MBps

1.144 GB/s

Memory bandwidth

2.656 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards Riva TNT2 M64 and Matrox G450, the size and number of monitors.

1x VGA

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 1x VGA

API support

The difference in supported APIs is Riva TNT2 M64 and Matrox G450. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

6.0

DirectX

6.0

1.2

OpenGL

None

N/A

Vulkan

N/A

OpenCL

None

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Riva TNT2 M64 and Matrox G450 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Riva TNT2 M64 or Matrox G450 good for gaming.

Select games to view

		low 1280x720	med. 1920x1080	high 1920x1080	ultra 1920x1080	QHD 2560x1440	4K 3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)	Riva TNT2 M64
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)	Matrox G450
Death Stranding (2020)	Riva TNT2 M64
Death Stranding (2020)	Matrox G450
F1 2020 (2020)	Riva TNT2 M64
F1 2020 (2020)	Matrox G450
Gears Tactics (2020)	Riva TNT2 M64
Gears Tactics (2020)	Matrox G450
Doom Eternal (2020)	Riva TNT2 M64
Doom Eternal (2020)	Matrox G450

Legend
5	Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
	May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30	Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40	Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60	Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
	May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
?	Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
	Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.