NVIDIA Quadro K620M
VS
AMD FirePro M4100
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
VS
AMD FirePro M4100

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro K620M and AMD FirePro M4100. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

606
Place in performance rating
630
Maxwell
Architecture
GCN
GM108
Code name
Mars
Mobile workstation
Type
Mobile workstation
1 March 2015 (6 years ago)
Release date
1 October 2013 (8 years ago)
GM108
GPU code name
Mars
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro K620M and AMD FirePro M4100 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

384
Pipelines
384
1029 MHz
Core clock speed
670 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
no data
Transistor count
950 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
30 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
17.98
Texture fill rate
16.08
863.2 gflops
Floating-point performance
514.6 gflops
384
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
1124 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
no data
Number of transistors
950 million
30 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro K620M and AMD FirePro M4100.

MXM-A (3.0)
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data
no data
Laptop size
medium sized

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro K620M and AMD FirePro M4100 can be seen in this section.

DDR3
Memory type
GDDR5
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
2000 MHz
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
14.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro K620M and AMD FirePro M4100, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs
1.2
Display Port
no data

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro K620M and AMD FirePro M4100 is the additional functionality.

+
3D Vision
no data
+
CUDA
no data
+
Optimus
no data
+
nView Display Management
no data
no data
AppAcceleration
+
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro K620M and AMD FirePro M4100. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.5
OpenGL
4.6
1.1.126
Vulkan
no data
5
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro K620M and AMD FirePro M4100 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro K620M or AMD FirePro M4100 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K620M
AMD FirePro M4100
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K620M
AMD FirePro M4100
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K620M
AMD FirePro M4100
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K620M
AMD FirePro M4100
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K620M
AMD FirePro M4100
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K620M

0.42% faster in synthetic tests

Advantages of AMD FirePro M4100

More memory bandwidth (64 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA Quadro K620M or AMD FirePro M4100?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro K620M .

NVIDIA Quadro K620M versus AMD FirePro M4100 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro K620M
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FirePro M4100