NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
VS
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
VS
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

622
Place in performance rating
393
24.88
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Kepler
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
GK107
Code name
Coffee Lake GT3e
Mobile workstation
Type
Laptop
23 July 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
1 September 2017 (4 years ago)
$109.94
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$350 (3.2x MSRP)
Price now
$999
0.36
Value for money
2.44
GK107
GPU code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

384
Pipelines
384
705 MHz
Core clock speed
300 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1,270 million
Transistor count
189 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
45 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
22.59
Texture fill rate
50.40
542.2 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
384
Pipelines / CUDA cores
48
no data
Boost clock speed
1200 MHz
1,270 million
Number of transistors
189 million
45 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
15 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655.

MXM-A (3.0)
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
medium sized
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
128 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
2800 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
44.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
-
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs
1.2
Display Port
no data

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the additional functionality.

+
CUDA
no data
+
Optimus
no data
+
3D Vision Pro
no data
+
Mosaic
no data
+
nView Display Management
no data
no data
Quick Sync
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.5
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan
1.1.103
5
Shader Model
6.4
1.2
OpenCL
2.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M or Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 54.8 17.3 11.6
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

Cheaper ($350 (3.2x MSRP) vs $999)

Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

6.23% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 45 Watt)

So, NVIDIA Quadro K1100M or Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 .

NVIDIA Quadro K1100M versus Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655