General info
The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.
Technical specs
Choose the best graphics card between Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M.
Memory
Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M can be seen in this section.
Video outputs and ports
The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, the size and number of monitors.
Technologies
The difference between Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M is the additional functionality.
API support
The difference in supported APIs is Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.
Gaming performance
Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M good for gaming.
|
low
1280x720 |
med.
1920x1080 |
high
1920x1080 |
ultra
1920x1080 |
QHD
2560x1440 |
4K
3840x2160 |
||
| Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | |||||||
| Death Stranding (2020) | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | |||||||
| F1 2020 (2020) | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | 79.9 | 38.4 | 28.8 | 18.5 | 12.6 | ||
| Gears Tactics (2020) | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | 54.8 | 17.3 | 11.6 | |||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | 98.1 | 37.5 | 20.5 | 14.8 | 10 | ||
| Doom Eternal (2020) | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | ||||||
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M | |||||||
| Legend | |
| 5 | Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags. |
| May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags. | |
| 30 | Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps) |
| 40 | Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps) |
| 60 | Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps) |
| May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game. | |
| ? | Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation. |
| Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible. | |
| The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results. | |
Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)
Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 75 Watt)
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
0.89% faster in synthetic tests
Cheaper ($797 vs $999)
More pipelines (640 vs 384)
So, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M .
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M performance benchmarks comparison
User rating
