NVIDIA Quadro FX 550
VS
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
NVIDIA Quadro FX 550
VS
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
154
0.48
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Curie
Architecture
Turing
NV43 A2
Code name
TU106
Workstation
Type
Mobile workstation
20 April 2006 (15 years ago)
Release date
27 May 2019 (2 years ago)
$189
Price now
no data
NV43 A2
GPU code name
N19E-Q1 MAX-Q
Workstation
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

no data
Pipelines
2304
360 MHz
Core clock speed
600 - 870 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
146 million
Transistor count
10,800 million
110 nm
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
30 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
2.880
Texture fill rate
175.0
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1920
no data
Boost clock speed
1215 - 1380 MHz
146 million
Number of transistors
10,800 million
30 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
60 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
198 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q can be seen in this section.

GDDR3
Memory type
GDDR6
128 MB
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
192 Bit
800 MHz
Memory clock speed
14000 MHz
12.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
448.0 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, the size and number of monitors.

2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
G-SYNC support
+

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is the additional functionality.

no data
VR Ready
+
no data
Multi Monitor
+
no data
CUDA
7.5

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.2.131
no data
Shader Model
6.5
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 or NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 550
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 178.3 119.2 104.4 102.6 67.5 31.6
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 550

Less power consumption (30 Watt vs 60 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (128 MB vs 6 GB)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

41.05% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 110 nm)

More memory bandwidth (448.0 GB/s vs 12.8 GB/s)

G-SYNC support

VR Ready

Multi Monitor

So, NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 or NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q .

NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 550
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q