AMD Cypress
VS
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
AMD Cypress
VS
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Cypress and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
154
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
Cypress
Code name
TU106
Desktop
Type
Mobile workstation
no data
Release date
27 May 2019 (2 years ago)
$12.72
Price now
no data
Cypress
GPU code name
N19E-Q1 MAX-Q
Desktop
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Cypress and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1600
Pipelines
2304
no data
Core clock speed
600 - 870 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
2,154 million
Transistor count
10,800 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
175.0
1600
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1920
no data
Boost clock speed
1215 - 1380 MHz
2,154 million
Number of transistors
10,800 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
60 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Cypress and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Cypress and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
GDDR6
no data
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
no data
Memory bus width
192 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
14000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
448.0 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Cypress and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
G-SYNC support
+

Technologies

The difference between AMD Cypress and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is the additional functionality.

no data
VR Ready
+
no data
Multi Monitor
+
no data
CUDA
7.5

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Cypress and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.2.131
no data
Shader Model
6.5
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cypress and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cypress or NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cypress
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 178.3 119.2 104.4 102.6 67.5 31.6
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cypress

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

41.31% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (2304 vs 1600)

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 40 nm)

G-SYNC support

VR Ready

Multi Monitor

So, AMD Cypress or NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q .

AMD Cypress versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Cypress
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q