NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
VS
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
VS
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

894
Place in performance rating
501
4.05
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Tesla
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
G80
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Workstation
Type
Laptop
5 March 2007 (14 years ago)
Release date
3 January 2017 (4 years ago)
$1,999
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$145 (0.1x MSRP)
Price now
$949
0.11
Value for money
1.25
G80
GPU code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Workstation
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

96
Pipelines
384
500 MHz
Core clock speed
300 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
681 million
Transistor count
189 million
90 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
134 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
24.00
Texture fill rate
55.20
230.4 gflops
Floating-point performance
883 gflops
96
Pipelines / CUDA cores
48
no data
Boost clock speed
1100 MHz
681 million
Number of transistors
189 million
134 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
15 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
229 mm
Length
no data
1x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 can be seen in this section.

GDDR3
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
768 MB
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
384 Bit
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
1400 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
67.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
no data
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650, the size and number of monitors.

2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 is the additional functionality.

no data
Quick Sync
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.1.103
no data
Shader Model
6.4
no data
OpenCL
2.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 or Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

Cheaper ($145 (0.1x MSRP) vs $949)

More maximum RAM amount (768 MB vs 32 GB)

Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650

6.09% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (384 vs 96)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 90 nm)

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 134 Watt)

So, NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 or Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 .

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 versus Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650