NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
VS
AMD Radeon R5 M230
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
VS
AMD Radeon R5 M230

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 and AMD Radeon R5 M230. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

894
Place in performance rating
920
4.05
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Tesla
Architecture
GCN
G80
Code name
Jet
Workstation
Type
Laptop
5 March 2007 (14 years ago)
Release date
7 January 2014 (7 years ago)
$1,999
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$145 (0.1x MSRP)
Price now
no data
0.11
Value for money
no data
G80
GPU code name
Jet / Sun
Workstation
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 and AMD Radeon R5 M230 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

96
Pipelines
320
500 MHz
Core clock speed
855 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
855 MHz
681 million
Transistor count
690 million
90 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
134 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
24.00
Texture fill rate
17.10
230.4 gflops
Floating-point performance
547.2 gflops
no data
Compute units
5
96
Pipelines / CUDA cores
320
no data
Boost clock speed
855 MHz
681 million
Number of transistors
690 million
134 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 and AMD Radeon R5 M230.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
229 mm
Length
no data
1x 6-pin
Supplementary power connectors
no data
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0 x8

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 and AMD Radeon R5 M230 can be seen in this section.

GDDR3
Memory type
DDR3
768 MB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
384 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
1400 MHz
Memory clock speed
1000 MHz
67.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
16 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 and AMD Radeon R5 M230, the size and number of monitors.

2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
Eyefinity
+

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 and AMD Radeon R5 M230 is the additional functionality.

no data
AppAcceleration
+
no data
HD3D
+
no data
PowerTune
+
no data
TrueAudio
-
no data
ZeroCore
+
no data
Enduro
-
no data
DualGraphics
1
no data
Switchable graphics
1
no data
PowerPlay
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 and AMD Radeon R5 M230. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
DirectX® 11
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
Not Listed
no data
Mantle
+

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 and AMD Radeon R5 M230 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 or AMD Radeon R5 M230 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
AMD Radeon R5 M230
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
AMD Radeon R5 M230
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
AMD Radeon R5 M230
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
AMD Radeon R5 M230
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
AMD Radeon R5 M230
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

0.3% faster in synthetic tests

More maximum RAM amount (768 MB vs 4 GB)

More memory bandwidth (67.2 GB/s vs 16 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 M230

More pipelines (320 vs 96)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 90 nm)

So, NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 or AMD Radeon R5 M230?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 .

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 versus AMD Radeon R5 M230 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R5 M230