NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
127
0.75
Value for money (0-100)
63.50
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
G84
Code name
TU116
Workstation
Type
Desktop
12 September 2007 (14 years ago)
Release date
29 October 2019 (2 years ago)
$129
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$93 (0.7x MSRP)
Price now
$604
no data
Value for money
29.99
G84
GPU code name
TU116
Workstation
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

16
Pipelines
1280
360 MHz
Core clock speed
1530 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
289 million
Transistor count
6,600 million
80 nm
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
35 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
2.880
Texture fill rate
138.0
23.04 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
16
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1408
no data
Boost clock speed
1725 MHz
289 million
Number of transistors
6,600 million
35 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
100 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
198 mm
Length
229 mm
None
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER can be seen in this section.

DDR2
Memory type
GDDR6
256 MB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1000 MHz
Memory clock speed
14000 MHz
8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
192.0 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, the size and number of monitors.

2x DVI
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
no data
G-SYNC support
+
no data
HDMI
+

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the additional functionality.

no data
VR Ready
+
no data
Multi Monitor
+
no data
CUDA
7.5
no data
G-SYNC
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.2.131
no data
Shader Model
6.5
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 370

Cheaper ($93 (0.7x MSRP) vs $604)

Less power consumption (35 Watt vs 100 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (256 MB vs 4 GB)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

45.12% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (1280 vs 16)

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 80 nm)

More memory bandwidth (192.0 GB/s vs 8 GB/s)

G-SYNC support

VR Ready

Multi Monitor

So, NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER .

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER