AMD Cayman
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
AMD Cayman
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Cayman and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
127
no data
Value for money (0-100)
63.50
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Turing
Cayman
Code name
TU116
Desktop
Type
Desktop
no data
Release date
29 October 2019 (2 years ago)
$17.44
Price now
$604
no data
Value for money
29.99
Cayman
GPU code name
TU116
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Cayman and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1536
Pipelines
1280
no data
Core clock speed
1530 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
2,640 million
Transistor count
6,600 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
138.0
1536
Pipelines / CUDA cores
1408
no data
Boost clock speed
1725 MHz
2,640 million
Number of transistors
6,600 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
100 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Cayman and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
229 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Cayman and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
GDDR6
no data
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
no data
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
14000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
192.0 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Cayman and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
no data
G-SYNC support
+
no data
HDMI
+

Technologies

The difference between AMD Cayman and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the additional functionality.

no data
VR Ready
+
no data
Multi Monitor
+
no data
CUDA
7.5
no data
G-SYNC
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Cayman and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.2.131
no data
Shader Model
6.5
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cayman and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cayman or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cayman
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cayman
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cayman
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cayman
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cayman
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cayman

Cheaper ($17.44 vs $604)

More pipelines (1536 vs 1280)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

45.48% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 nm vs 40 nm)

G-SYNC support

VR Ready

Multi Monitor

So, AMD Cayman or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER .

AMD Cayman versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Cayman
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER