NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
VS
NVIDIA NVS 310
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
VS
NVIDIA NVS 310

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M and NVIDIA NVS 310. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

872
Place in performance rating
1002
G9x
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
G92
Code name
GF119
Mobile workstation
Type
Workstation
23 February 2008 (13 years ago)
Release date
26 June 2012 (9 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$159
$80
Price now
$63 (0.4x MSRP)
0.15
Value for money
0.03
NB8E-GLM
GPU code name
GF119
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M and NVIDIA NVS 310 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

64
Pipelines
48
500 MHz
Core clock speed
523 MHz
754 million
Transistor count
292 million
65 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
70 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
20 Watt
16.00
Texture fill rate
4.184
160 gflops
Floating-point performance
100.4 gflops
96
Pipelines / CUDA cores
48
754 million
Number of transistors
292 million
70 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
20 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M and NVIDIA NVS 310.

MXM-HE
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
156 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
large
Laptop size
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M and NVIDIA NVS 310 can be seen in this section.

GDDR3
Memory type
DDR3
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
800 MHz
Memory clock speed
1750 MHz
51.14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
14 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M and NVIDIA NVS 310, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
2x DisplayPort

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M and NVIDIA NVS 310 is the additional functionality.

+
PCI-E 16x
no data
+
Gigathread technology
no data
+
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting)
no data
+
PowerMizer 7.0
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M and NVIDIA NVS 310. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M and NVIDIA NVS 310 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M or NVIDIA NVS 310 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
NVIDIA NVS 310
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
NVIDIA NVS 310
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
NVIDIA NVS 310
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
NVIDIA NVS 310
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
NVIDIA NVS 310
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

1.1% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (64 vs 48)

More memory bandwidth (51.14 GB/s vs 14 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA NVS 310

Cheaper ($63 (0.4x MSRP) vs $80)

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 65 nm)

Less power consumption (20 Watt vs 70 Watt)

So, NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M or NVIDIA NVS 310?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M .

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M versus NVIDIA NVS 310 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA NVS 310