NVIDIA GeForce MX350
VS
3D Rage LT PRO AGP
NVIDIA GeForce MX350
VS
3D Rage LT PRO AGP

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and 3D Rage LT PRO AGP. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

384
Place in performance rating
not rated
Pascal
Architecture
no data
GP107
Code name
no data
Laptop
Type
no data
20 February 2020 (1 year ago)
Release date
1 November 1997 (24 years ago)
no data
Price now
$154
N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
GPU code name
Rage LT
Laptop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and 3D Rage LT PRO AGP based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

640
Pipelines
no data
1354 MHz
Core clock speed
75 MHz
937 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
3,300 million
Transistor count
no data
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
350 nm
20 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
29.98
Texture fill rate
0.08
640
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
1468 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
3,300 million
Number of transistors
8 million
20 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and 3D Rage LT PRO AGP.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
AGP 2x
None
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and 3D Rage LT PRO AGP can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
SDR
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
8 MB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
7000 MHz
Memory clock speed
100 MHz
56.06 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
800 MB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and 3D Rage LT PRO AGP, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
no data

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and 3D Rage LT PRO AGP is the additional functionality.

+
Multi Monitor
no data
+
GPU Boost
no data
6.1
CUDA
no data
+
Optimus
no data
+
GameWorks
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and 3D Rage LT PRO AGP. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_1)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
1.2.131
Vulkan
no data
6.4
Shader Model
no data
1.2
OpenCL
None

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and 3D Rage LT PRO AGP graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce MX350 or 3D Rage LT PRO AGP good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce MX350 29 14 12 10
3D Rage LT PRO AGP
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce MX350 40 18.4 17.4 17.1
3D Rage LT PRO AGP
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce MX350 102 49 36 20
3D Rage LT PRO AGP
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce MX350 134.75 50.05 31.4 20.5
3D Rage LT PRO AGP
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce MX350 40.2
3D Rage LT PRO AGP
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX350

14.97% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 350 nm)

Multi Monitor

Advantages of 3D Rage LT PRO AGP

More maximum RAM amount (8 MB vs 2 GB)

More memory bandwidth (800 MB/s vs 56.06 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GeForce MX350 or 3D Rage LT PRO AGP?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce MX350 .

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 versus 3D Rage LT PRO AGP performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce MX350
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score 3D Rage LT PRO AGP