NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
VS
AMD Radeon R9 290
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
VS
AMD Radeon R9 290

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI and AMD Radeon R9 290. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

196
Place in performance rating
166
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 2.0
N13E-GTX
Code name
Hawaii
Laptop
Type
Desktop
4 June 2012 (9 years ago)
Release date
5 November 2013 (8 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$399
$149
Price now
$237 (0.6x MSRP)
26.57
Value for money
25.21
N13E-GTX
GPU code name
Hawaii
Laptop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI and AMD Radeon R9 290 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

2688
Pipelines
2560
720 MHz
Core clock speed
947 MHz
no data
Transistor count
6,200 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
275 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
151.5
no data
Floating-point performance
4,849 gflops
2688
Pipelines / CUDA cores
2560
no data
Number of transistors
6,200 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
275 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI and AMD Radeon R9 290.

no data
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
275 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
large
Laptop size
no data
+
SLI options
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI and AMD Radeon R9 290 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
2x 4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2x 256 Bit
Memory bus width
512 Bit
3600 MHz
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
320.0 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI and AMD Radeon R9 290, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
no data
HDMI
+

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI and AMD Radeon R9 290 is the additional functionality.

+
3D Vision
no data
+
CUDA
no data
+
Optimus
no data
+
Verde Drivers
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI and AMD Radeon R9 290. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
DirectX
12 (12_0)
no data
OpenGL
4.6

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI and AMD Radeon R9 290 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI or AMD Radeon R9 290 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
AMD Radeon R9 290
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
AMD Radeon R9 290
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
AMD Radeon R9 290
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
AMD Radeon R9 290
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
AMD Radeon R9 290
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI

Cheaper ($149 vs $237 (0.6x MSRP))

More pipelines (2688 vs 2560)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290

8.22% faster in synthetic tests

More maximum RAM amount (4 GB vs 2x 4 GB)

So, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI or AMD Radeon R9 290?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R9 290 .

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI versus AMD Radeon R9 290 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R9 290