AMD Radeon R9 290
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
AMD Radeon R9 290
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon R9 290 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

166
Place in performance rating
499
no data
Value for money (0-100)
22.49
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
Hawaii
Code name
GK107
Desktop
Type
Desktop
5 November 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
6 September 2012 (9 years ago)
$399
Launch price (MSRP)
$109
$237 (0.6x MSRP)
Price now
$247 (2.3x MSRP)
25.21
Value for money
1.09
Hawaii
GPU code name
GK107
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon R9 290 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

2560
Pipelines
384
947 MHz
Core clock speed
1058 MHz
6,200 million
Transistor count
1,270 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
275 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
64 Watt
151.5
Texture fill rate
33.9 billion/sec
4,849 gflops
Floating-point performance
812.5 gflops
no data
CUDA cores
384
2560
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
6,200 million
Number of transistors
1,270 million
275 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
64 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon R9 290 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
275 mm
Length
5.70" (14.5 cm)
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
no data
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
no data
Height
4.38" (11.1 cm)

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon R9 290 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
GDDR5
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
512 Bit
Memory bus width
128-bit GDDR5
5000 MHz
Memory clock speed
5.0 GB/s
320.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
80.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon R9 290 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650, the size and number of monitors.

2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Display Connectors
One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini HDMI
no data
Multi monitor support
4 displays
no data
HDCP
+
no data
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
no data
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
+
HDMI
+

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon R9 290 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 is the additional functionality.

no data
3D Vision
+
no data
CUDA
+
no data
3D Gaming
+
no data
FXAA
+
no data
TXAA
+
no data
Adaptive VSync
+
no data
3D Blu-Ray
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon R9 290 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.3
no data
Vulkan
1.1.126
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R9 290 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R9 290 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R9 290
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R9 290
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R9 290
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R9 290
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R9 290
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 290

29.38% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($237 (0.6x MSRP) vs $247 (2.3x MSRP))

More pipelines (2560 vs 384)

More maximum RAM amount (4 GB vs 1 GB)

More memory bandwidth (320.0 GB/s vs 80.0 GB/s)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

Less power consumption (64 Watt vs 275 Watt)

So, AMD Radeon R9 290 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R9 290 .

AMD Radeon R9 290 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R9 290
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650