NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
VS
AMD Radeon R5 M335
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
VS
AMD Radeon R5 M335

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and AMD Radeon R5 M335. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

2061
Place in performance rating
832
0.52
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GT218
Code name
Exo
Desktop
Type
Laptop
12 July 2010
Release date
16 June 2015 (6 years ago)
$52
Price now
$891
no data
Value for money
0.19
no data
GPU code name
Exo XT DDR3
no data
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and AMD Radeon R5 M335 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

16
Pipelines
320
520 MHz
Core clock speed
1070 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1070 MHz
260 million
Transistor count
690 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
25 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
4.160
Texture fill rate
21.40
39.36 gflops
Floating-point performance
684.8 gflops
no data
Compute units
5
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
320
no data
Boost clock speed
1070 MHz
no data
Number of transistors
690 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and AMD Radeon R5 M335.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
170 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and AMD Radeon R5 M335 can be seen in this section.

DDR2
Memory type
DDR3
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
800 MHz
Memory clock speed
1100 MHz
6.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and AMD Radeon R5 M335, the size and number of monitors.

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and AMD Radeon R5 M335 is the additional functionality.

no data
AppAcceleration
-
no data
HD3D
+
no data
PowerTune
+
no data
TrueAudio
-
no data
ZeroCore
+
no data
Enduro
-
no data
DualGraphics
1
no data
Switchable graphics
1

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and AMD Radeon R5 M335. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
DirectX® 12
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
no data
Vulkan
+
no data
Shader Model
5.0
no data
OpenCL
Not Listed
no data
Mantle
+

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and AMD Radeon R5 M335 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 or AMD Radeon R5 M335 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
AMD Radeon R5 M335
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
AMD Radeon R5 M335
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
AMD Radeon R5 M335
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
AMD Radeon R5 M335
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
AMD Radeon R5 M335
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

Cheaper ($52 vs $891)

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 4 GB)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 M335

2.43% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (320 vs 16)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

More memory bandwidth (14.4 GB/s vs 6.4 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 or AMD Radeon R5 M335?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R5 M335 .

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 versus AMD Radeon R5 M335 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R5 M335