NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

2061
Place in performance rating
835
0.52
Value for money (0-100)
no data
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
GT218
Code name
GF108
Desktop
Type
Laptop
12 July 2010
Release date
6 December 2011 (10 years ago)
$52
Price now
$1121
no data
Value for money
0.02
no data
GPU code name
N13P-GL/GL2
no data
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

16
Pipelines
96
520 MHz
Core clock speed
no data
260 million
Transistor count
585 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 / 28 nm
25 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
4.160
Texture fill rate
no data
39.36 gflops
Floating-point performance
253.4 gflops
no data
CUDA cores
96
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
96
no data
Number of transistors
585 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
33 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
170 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data
no data
Laptop size
medium sized
no data
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M can be seen in this section.

DDR2
Memory type
DDR3\GDDR5
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
no data
800 MHz
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
6.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M, the size and number of monitors.

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
No outputs
no data
HDCP
+
no data
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
no data
HDMI
+

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M is the additional functionality.

no data
3D Vision
+
no data
CUDA
+
no data
Optimus
+
no data
3D Blu-Ray
+
no data
DirectX 11
DirectX 11
no data
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
no data
DirectCompute
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.5
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
Shader Model
5.1
no data
OpenCL
1.1
no data
DirectX 11.2
12 API

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 or NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

Cheaper ($52 vs $1121)

Less power consumption (25 Watt vs 33 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 1 GB)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M

2.37% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (96 vs 16)

So, NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 or NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M .

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M