Intel UHD Graphics 630
VS
3D Rage
Intel UHD Graphics 630
VS
3D Rage

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Intel UHD Graphics 630 and 3D Rage. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

597
Place in performance rating
not rated
Gen. 9.5
Architecture
Mach
Comet Lake GT2
Code name
no data
Desktop
Type
no data
1 October 2017 (4 years ago)
Release date
1 April 1996 (25 years ago)
$1009
Price now
$9.95
1.00
Value for money
no data
Kaby-Lake-H-GT2
GPU code name
Mach64 GT
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between Intel UHD Graphics 630 and 3D Rage based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

184
Pipelines
no data
300 MHz
Core clock speed
44 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
189 million
Transistor count
no data
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
500 nm
15 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
26.45
Texture fill rate
0.04
460.8 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
24
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
1150 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
189 million
Number of transistors
5 million
15 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the Intel UHD Graphics 630 and 3D Rage.

PCIe 3.0 x1
Interface
PCI

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics Intel UHD Graphics 630 and 3D Rage can be seen in this section.

System Shared
Memory type
EDO
no data
Maximum RAM amount
2 MB
64/128 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
57 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
456.0 MB/s
+
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards Intel UHD Graphics 630 and 3D Rage, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x VGA

Technologies

The difference between Intel UHD Graphics 630 and 3D Rage is the additional functionality.

+
Quick Sync
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is Intel UHD Graphics 630 and 3D Rage. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_1)
DirectX
5.0
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1.103
Vulkan
N/A
6.5
Shader Model
no data
2.1
OpenCL
N/A

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel UHD Graphics 630 and 3D Rage graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel UHD Graphics 630 or 3D Rage good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 630
3D Rage
Death Stranding (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 630
3D Rage
F1 2020 (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 630
3D Rage
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 630 38.1 13.2 7.5 5.4
3D Rage
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel UHD Graphics 630
3D Rage
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 630

6.52% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 500 nm)

Advantages of 3D Rage

Cheaper ($9.95 vs $1009)

So, Intel UHD Graphics 630 or 3D Rage?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel UHD Graphics 630 .

Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus 3D Rage performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

5.0 Out of 1 CpusData Score Intel UHD Graphics 630
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score 3D Rage