Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
VS
AMD FirePro W5100
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
VS
AMD FirePro W5100

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and AMD FirePro W5100. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

541
Place in performance rating
374
no data
Value for money (0-100)
20.28
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Kaby Lake GT3e
Code name
Bonaire
Laptop
Type
Workstation
3 January 2017 (4 years ago)
Release date
31 March 2014 (7 years ago)
$669
Price now
$299
1.45
Value for money
4.26
Kaby Lake GT3e
GPU code name
Bonaire
Laptop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and AMD FirePro W5100 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

384
Pipelines
768
300 MHz
Core clock speed
930 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
189 million
Transistor count
2,080 million
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
15 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
52.80
Texture fill rate
44.64
no data
Floating-point performance
1,428 gflops
48
Pipelines / CUDA cores
768
1050 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
189 million
Number of transistors
2,080 million
15 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
400 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and AMD FirePro W5100.

PCIe 3.0 x1
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
171 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
no data
Form factor
full height / half length

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and AMD FirePro W5100 can be seen in this section.

DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Memory type
GDDR5
32 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
64/128 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
96 GB/s
+
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and AMD FirePro W5100, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
no data
StereoOutput3D
1
no data
Dual-link DVI support
1
no data
HD сomponent video output
1
no data
DisplayPort count
4

Technologies

The difference between Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and AMD FirePro W5100 is the additional functionality.

+
Quick Sync
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and AMD FirePro W5100. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1.103
Vulkan
no data
6.4
Shader Model
no data
2.1
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 and AMD FirePro W5100 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 or AMD FirePro W5100 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
AMD FirePro W5100
Death Stranding (2020) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
AMD FirePro W5100
F1 2020 (2020) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
AMD FirePro W5100
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
AMD FirePro W5100
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
AMD FirePro W5100
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 50 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (32 GB vs 4 GB)

Advantages of AMD FirePro W5100

7.06% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($299 vs $669)

More pipelines (768 vs 384)

So, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 or AMD FirePro W5100?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FirePro W5100 .

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 versus AMD FirePro W5100 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FirePro W5100