AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

498
Place in performance rating
846
no data
Value for money (0-100)
2.12
GCN
Architecture
Tesla
Kaveri Spectre
Code name
G92
Desktop
Type
Desktop
14 January 2014 (7 years ago)
Release date
29 October 2007 (14 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$349
no data
Price now
$201 (0.6x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
0.09
Kaveri Spectre
GPU code name
G92
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

384
Pipelines
112
720 MHz
Core clock speed
600 MHz
no data
Transistor count
754 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
105 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
33.6 billion/sec
no data
Floating-point performance
336.0 gflops
no data
Maximum GPU temperature
105 °C
no data
CUDA cores
112
384
Pipelines / CUDA cores
112
no data
Number of transistors
754 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
105 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT.

no data
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
9" (22.9 cm)
no data
Supplementary power connectors
6-pin & 8-pin
no data
SLI options
2-way
no data
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
GDDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
57.6 GB/s
+
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
Dual Link DVIHDTV
no data
Multi monitor support
+
no data
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
no data
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT is the additional functionality.

no data
3D Vision
+
no data
CUDA
+
+
DirectCompute 5.0
no data
no data
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)
128bit

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
no data
OpenGL
2.1
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
Shader Model
4.0
no data
OpenCL
1.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) or NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

3.82% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (384 vs 112)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 65 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT

There is no accountable advantage

So, AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) or NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) .

AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) versus NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT