AMD Radeon R7 240
VS
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
AMD Radeon R7 240
VS
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon R7 240 and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

699
Place in performance rating
125
13.47
Value for money (0-100)
no data
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Oland
Code name
Fiji
Desktop
Type
Desktop
8 October 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
24 June 2015 (6 years ago)
$69
Launch price (MSRP)
$649
$261 (3.8x MSRP)
Price now
$545 (0.8x MSRP)
reference
Design
reference
0.22
Value for money
22.86
Oland
GPU code name
Fiji
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon R7 240 and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

320
Pipelines
4096
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
950 million
Transistor count
8,900 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
50 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
275 Watt
14.00
Texture fill rate
268.8
499.2 gflops
Floating-point performance
8,602 gflops
no data
Compute units
64
320
Pipelines / CUDA cores
4096
780 MHz
Boost clock speed
1050 MHz
950 million
Number of transistors
8,900 million
50 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
275 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon R7 240 and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X.

PCIe 3.0 x8
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
168 mm
Length
191 mm
N/A
Supplementary power connectors
2x 8-pin
PCIe 3.0
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
no data
Bridgeless CrossFire
1

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon R7 240 and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
2 GB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
4096 Bit
1150 MHz
Memory clock speed
1050 MHz
72 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
512 GB/s
no data
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
+

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon R7 240 and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X, the size and number of monitors.

1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Display Connectors
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
no data
Eyefinity
1
no data
Number of Eyefinity displays
6
+
HDMI
+
-
DisplayPort support
+

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon R7 240 and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X is the additional functionality.

-
AppAcceleration
+
1
CrossFire
1
no data
FRTC
1
1
FreeSync
1
-
HD3D
+
no data
LiquidVR
1
-
PowerTune
+
no data
TressFX
1
-
TrueAudio
+
-
ZeroCore
-
no data
VCE
+
+
DDMA audio
+
-
Enduro
-
no data
UVD
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon R7 240 and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX® 12
DirectX
DirectX® 12
4.6
OpenGL
4.5
no data
Vulkan
+
5.1
Shader Model
6.3
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
-
Mantle
+

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R7 240 and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R7 240 or AMD Radeon R9 FURY X good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R7 240
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R7 240
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R7 240
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R7 240
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R7 240
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 240

3.8% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($261 (3.8x MSRP) vs $545 (0.8x MSRP))

Less power consumption (50 Watt vs 275 Watt)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

More pipelines (4096 vs 320)

More maximum RAM amount (4 GB vs 2 GB)

More memory bandwidth (512 GB/s vs 72 GB/s)

So, AMD Radeon R7 240 or AMD Radeon R9 FURY X?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R7 240 .

AMD Radeon R7 240 versus AMD Radeon R9 FURY X performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R7 240
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R9 FURY X