AMD Radeon R5 M315
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
AMD Radeon R5 M315
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon R5 M315 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

865
Place in performance rating
not rated
no data
Value for money (0-100)
0.47
GCN
Architecture
Rankine
Meso
Code name
NV35
Laptop
Type
Workstation
16 June 2015 (6 years ago)
Release date
22 July 2003 (18 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$203
no data
Price now
$443 (2.2x MSRP)
Meso LE (DDR3)
GPU code name
NV35
Laptop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon R5 M315 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

384
Pipelines
no data
970 MHz
Core clock speed
400 MHz
1,550 million
Transistor count
135 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
130 nm
23.28
Texture fill rate
3.200
745.0 gflops
Floating-point performance
no data
5
Compute units
no data
320
Pipelines / CUDA cores
no data
1,550 million
Number of transistors
135 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon R5 M315 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000.

PCIe 3.0 x8
Interface
AGP 8x
no data
Supplementary power connectors
1x Molex
PCIe 3.0
Bus support
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon R5 M315 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000 can be seen in this section.

DDR3
Memory type
DDR
4 GB
Maximum RAM amount
256 MB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
1000 MHz
Memory clock speed
850 MHz
14.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
27.2 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon R5 M315 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon R5 M315 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000 is the additional functionality.

-
AppAcceleration
no data
+
HD3D
no data
+
PowerTune
no data
-
TrueAudio
no data
+
ZeroCore
no data
-
Enduro
no data
1
DualGraphics
no data
1
Switchable graphics
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon R5 M315 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX® 12
DirectX
9.0a
4.4
OpenGL
1.5 (2.1)
6.0
Shader Model
no data
Not Listed
OpenCL
no data
+
Mantle
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R5 M315 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R5 M315 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R5 M315
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R5 M315
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R5 M315
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R5 M315
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R5 M315
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 M315

1.97% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 130 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000

More maximum RAM amount (256 MB vs 4 GB)

More memory bandwidth (27.2 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s)

So, AMD Radeon R5 M315 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R5 M315 .

AMD Radeon R5 M315 versus NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R5 M315
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000