AMD Ellesmere
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
AMD Ellesmere
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Ellesmere and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
768
GCN 4.0
Architecture
G9x
Ellesmere
Code name
G94
Desktop
Type
Laptop
no data
Release date
2 March 2009 (12 years ago)
$49
Price now
$230
no data
Value for money
0.13
Ellesmere
GPU code name
N10E-GS1
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Ellesmere and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

2304
Pipelines
64
no data
Core clock speed
600 MHz
5,700 million
Transistor count
505 million
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
19 billion/sec
no data
Floating-point performance
192 gflops
no data
CUDA cores
64
no data
Gigaflops
288
2304
Pipelines / CUDA cores
64
5,700 million
Number of transistors
505 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
60 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Ellesmere and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M.

no data
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Laptop size
large
no data
SLI options
2-way
no data
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
no data
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Ellesmere and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
GDDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory bandwidth
51 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Ellesmere and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
VGADisplayPortDual Link DVIHDMILVDSSingle Link DVI
no data
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
no data
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
no data
HDMI
+

Technologies

The difference between AMD Ellesmere and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M is the additional functionality.

no data
CUDA
+
no data
HybridPower
+
no data
PureVideo HD
+
no data
Power management
8.0

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Ellesmere and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
no data
Vulkan
N/A
no data
Shader Model
4.0
no data
OpenCL
1.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Ellesmere and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Ellesmere or NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Ellesmere
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Ellesmere
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Ellesmere
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Ellesmere
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Ellesmere
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Ellesmere

Cheaper ($49 vs $230)

More pipelines (2304 vs 64)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 55 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M

3.1% faster in synthetic tests

So, AMD Ellesmere or NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M .

AMD Ellesmere versus NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Ellesmere
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce GTS 160M