AMD Cedar
VS
NVIDIA Quadro P5200
AMD Cedar
VS
NVIDIA Quadro P5200

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro P5200. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
98
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Pascal
Cedar
Code name
no data
Desktop
Type
Mobile workstation
no data
Release date
11 January 2017 (4 years ago)
$17.81
Price now
$3894
no data
Value for money
5.43
Cedar
GPU code name
GP104
Desktop
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro P5200 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

80
Pipelines
2560
no data
Core clock speed
1316 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
292 million
Transistor count
no data
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
16 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
279.4
80
Pipelines / CUDA cores
2560
no data
Boost clock speed
1569 MHz
292 million
Number of transistors
7,200 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
100 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro P5200.

no data
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None
no data
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro P5200 can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
GDDR5
no data
Maximum RAM amount
16 GB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
7216 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
230.4 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro P5200, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro P5200 is the additional functionality.

no data
CUDA
6.1
no data
Optimus
+
no data
3D Vision Pro
+
no data
nView
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro P5200. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.2.131
no data
Shader Model
6.4
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Cedar and NVIDIA Quadro P5200 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Cedar or NVIDIA Quadro P5200 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro P5200
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Cedar
NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Cedar

Cheaper ($17.81 vs $3894)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P5200

50.8% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (2560 vs 80)

Finer manufacturing process technology (16 nm vs 40 nm)

So, AMD Cedar or NVIDIA Quadro P5200?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro P5200 .

AMD Cedar versus NVIDIA Quadro P5200 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Cedar
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro P5200