AMD Caicos
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
AMD Caicos
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Caicos and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
872
TeraScale 2
Architecture
G9x
Caicos
Code name
G92
Desktop
Type
Mobile workstation
no data
Release date
23 February 2008 (13 years ago)
$10.38
Price now
$80
no data
Value for money
0.15
Caicos
GPU code name
NB8E-GLM
Desktop
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Caicos and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

160
Pipelines
64
no data
Core clock speed
500 MHz
370 million
Transistor count
754 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
70 Watt
no data
Texture fill rate
16.00
no data
Floating-point performance
160 gflops
160
Pipelines / CUDA cores
96
370 million
Number of transistors
754 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
70 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Caicos and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M.

no data
Interface
MXM-HE
no data
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Caicos and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
GDDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
no data
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
51.14 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Caicos and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between AMD Caicos and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M is the additional functionality.

no data
PCI-E 16x
+
no data
Gigathread technology
+
no data
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting)
+
no data
PowerMizer 7.0
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Caicos and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Caicos and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Caicos or NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Caicos
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Caicos

Cheaper ($10.38 vs $80)

More pipelines (160 vs 64)

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 65 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

3.16% faster in synthetic tests

So, AMD Caicos or NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M .

AMD Caicos versus NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Caicos
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M