Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
VS
Intel HD Graphics 2500
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
VS
Intel HD Graphics 2500

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 2500. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
967
Gen. 5 Arrandale
Architecture
Gen. 7 Ivy Bridge
no data
Code name
Ivy Bridge GT1
no data
Type
Laptop
10 January 2010 (11 years ago)
Release date
1 April 2012 (9 years ago)
no data
Price now
$521
no data
Value for money
0.01
GMA HD
GPU code name
Ivy Bridge GT1
Laptop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 2500 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

no data
Pipelines
48
500 MHz
Core clock speed
650 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
no data
Transistor count
392 million
45 nm
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
no data
Texture fill rate
6.900
no data
Floating-point performance
13.8 gflops
12
Pipelines / CUDA cores
6
no data
Boost clock speed
1150 MHz
no data
Number of transistors
392 million
35 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 2500.

no data
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
no data
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 2500 can be seen in this section.

no data
Memory type
System Shared
no data
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
no data
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 2500, the size and number of monitors.

no data
Display Connectors
No outputs

API support

The difference in supported APIs is Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 2500. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
DirectX
11.1 (11_0)
no data
OpenGL
4.0

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 2500 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics or Intel HD Graphics 2500 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
Intel HD Graphics 2500
Death Stranding (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
Intel HD Graphics 2500
F1 2020 (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
Intel HD Graphics 2500
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
Intel HD Graphics 2500
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
Intel HD Graphics 2500
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics

There is no accountable advantage

Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 2500

0.01% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (22 nm vs 45 nm)

So, Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics or Intel HD Graphics 2500?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel HD Graphics 2500 .

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics versus Intel HD Graphics 2500 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
0.0 Out of 1 CpusData Score Intel HD Graphics 2500