NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
VS
AMD Radeon R7 M265
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
VS
AMD Radeon R7 M265

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M and AMD Radeon R7 M265. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

1019
Place in performance rating
803
14.24
Value for money (0-100)
no data
G7x
Architecture
GCN
G71
Code name
Topaz
Mobile workstation
Type
Laptop
29 September 2005 (16 years ago)
Release date
7 January 2014 (7 years ago)
$99.99
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$126 (1.3x MSRP)
Price now
$585
0.02
Value for money
0.06
G71glm
GPU code name
Opal XT / Mars
Mobile workstation
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M and AMD Radeon R7 M265 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

32
Pipelines
384
8 MHz
Core clock speed
825 MHz
500 MHz
Boost Clock
825 MHz
278 million
Transistor count
1,550 million
90 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
45 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
12.00
Texture fill rate
23.52
no data
Floating-point performance
633.6 gflops
no data
Compute units
6
32
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
500 MHz
Boost clock speed
825 MHz
278 million
Number of transistors
1,550 million
45 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M and AMD Radeon R7 M265.

MXM-III
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
large
Laptop size
medium sized
no data
Bus support
PCIe 3.0 x8

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M and AMD Radeon R7 M265 can be seen in this section.

GDDR3
Memory type
DDR3
512 MB
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
256 Bit
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1200 MHz
Memory clock speed
1000 MHz
38.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
32 GB/s
-
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M and AMD Radeon R7 M265, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M and AMD Radeon R7 M265 is the additional functionality.

no data
AppAcceleration
-
no data
FreeSync
1
no data
HD3D
+
no data
PowerTune
+
no data
TrueAudio
-
no data
ZeroCore
+
no data
Enduro
-
no data
DualGraphics
1
no data
Switchable graphics
1
no data
Zero Core
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M and AMD Radeon R7 M265. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
DirectX® 11
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
no data
Shader Model
6.3
no data
OpenCL
Not Listed
no data
Mantle
+

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M and AMD Radeon R7 M265 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M or AMD Radeon R7 M265 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
AMD Radeon R7 M265
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
AMD Radeon R7 M265
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
AMD Radeon R7 M265
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
AMD Radeon R7 M265
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
AMD Radeon R7 M265
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M

Cheaper ($126 (1.3x MSRP) vs $585)

More maximum RAM amount (512 MB vs 4 GB)

More memory bandwidth (38.4 GB/s vs 32 GB/s)

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 M265

2.76% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (384 vs 32)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 90 nm)

So, NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M or AMD Radeon R7 M265?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R7 M265 .

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M versus AMD Radeon R7 M265 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R7 M265