NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

1673
Place in performance rating
855
0.10
Value for money (0-100)
0.66
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
G9x
GT218
Code name
G92
Desktop
Type
Mobile workstation
13 June 2012
Release date
14 August 2008 (13 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$925
$284
Price now
$163 (0.2x MSRP)
no data
Value for money
0.13
no data
GPU code name
NB9E-GLM3
no data
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

16
Pipelines
128
589 MHz
Core clock speed
550 MHz
260 million
Transistor count
754 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
50 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
4.712
Texture fill rate
35.20
44.86 gflops
Floating-point performance
352.0 gflops
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
128
no data
Number of transistors
754 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
75 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
MXM-HE
168 mm
Length
no data
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data
no data
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M can be seen in this section.

DDR2
Memory type
GDDR3
128 MB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
1200 MHz
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
9.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M, the size and number of monitors.

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M is the additional functionality.

no data
CUDA
+
no data
PowerMizer 8.0
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

Finer manufacturing process technology (40 nm vs 65 nm)

Less power consumption (50 Watt vs 75 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (128 MB vs 1 GB)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

2.38% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($163 (0.2x MSRP) vs $284)

More pipelines (128 vs 16)

More memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s vs 9.6 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M .

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 versus NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M