NVIDIA GeForce 705M
VS
AMD FirePro W8100
NVIDIA GeForce 705M
VS
AMD FirePro W8100

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards NVIDIA GeForce 705M and AMD FirePro W8100. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

879
Place in performance rating
195
no data
Value for money (0-100)
6.68
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GF119
Code name
Hawaii
Laptop
Type
Workstation
1 June 2013 (8 years ago)
Release date
23 June 2014 (7 years ago)
$163
Price now
$686
0.07
Value for money
10.39
GF119
GPU code name
Hawaii
Laptop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between NVIDIA GeForce 705M and AMD FirePro W8100 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

48
Pipelines
2560
775 MHz
Core clock speed
824 MHz
292 million
Transistor count
6,200 million
40 nm
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
15 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
220 Watt
5.904
Texture fill rate
131.8
141.7 gflops
Floating-point performance
4,219 gflops
48
Pipelines / CUDA cores
2560
292 million
Number of transistors
6,200 million
15 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
750 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the NVIDIA GeForce 705M and AMD FirePro W8100.

PCIe 2.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
no data
Length
279 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
PCI Express 2.0
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
no data
Form factor
full height / full length

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics NVIDIA GeForce 705M and AMD FirePro W8100 can be seen in this section.

DDR3
Memory type
GDDR5
1 GB
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
64 Bit
Memory bus width
512 Bit
1800 MHz
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
14.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
320 GB/s
-
Shared memory
no data
DDR3
Standard memory configuration
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards NVIDIA GeForce 705M and AMD FirePro W8100, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI
+
HDMI
no data
Up to 2048x1536
VGA аnalog display support
no data
Up to 2560x1600
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
no data
no data
StereoOutput3D
1
no data
Dual-link DVI support
1
no data
HD сomponent video output
1
no data
DisplayPort count
4
Up to 2560x1600
eDP 1.2 signal support
no data
Up to 1920x1200
LVDS signal support
no data
+
HDCP content protection
no data
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
no data
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
no data

Technologies

The difference between NVIDIA GeForce 705M and AMD FirePro W8100 is the additional functionality.

+
CUDA
no data
+
Optimus
no data
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
no data
+
FXAA
no data
+
Blu-Ray 3D Support
no data
+
Direct Compute
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is NVIDIA GeForce 705M and AMD FirePro W8100. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 API
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.5
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
Vulkan
no data
5.1
Shader Model
no data
1.1
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for NVIDIA GeForce 705M and AMD FirePro W8100 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the NVIDIA GeForce 705M or AMD FirePro W8100 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 705M
AMD FirePro W8100
Death Stranding (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 705M
AMD FirePro W8100
F1 2020 (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 705M
AMD FirePro W8100
Gears Tactics (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 705M
AMD FirePro W8100
Doom Eternal (2020) NVIDIA GeForce 705M
AMD FirePro W8100
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 705M

Cheaper ($163 vs $686)

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 220 Watt)

Advantages of AMD FirePro W8100

30.24% faster in synthetic tests

More pipelines (2560 vs 48)

Finer manufacturing process technology (28 nm vs 40 nm)

More maximum RAM amount (8 GB vs 1 GB)

More memory bandwidth (320 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s)

So, NVIDIA GeForce 705M or AMD FirePro W8100?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD FirePro W8100 .

NVIDIA GeForce 705M versus AMD FirePro W8100 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce 705M
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD FirePro W8100