Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
VS
NVIDIA NVS 300
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
VS
NVIDIA NVS 300

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA NVS 300. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

393
Place in performance rating
not rated
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Coffee Lake GT3e
Code name
no data
Laptop
Type
no data
1 September 2017 (4 years ago)
Release date
8 January 2011 (10 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$109
$999
Price now
$36 (0.3x MSRP)
2.44
Value for money
no data
Kaby Lake GT3e
GPU code name
GT218
Laptop
Market segment
Workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA NVS 300 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

384
Pipelines
no data
300 MHz
Core clock speed
520 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
189 million
Transistor count
no data
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
15 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
no data
50.40
Texture fill rate
4.160
no data
Floating-point performance
39.36 gflops
48
Pipelines / CUDA cores
16
1200 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
189 million
Number of transistors
260 million
15 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
18 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA NVS 300.

PCIe 3.0 x1
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
no data
Length
145 mm
no data
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA NVS 300 can be seen in this section.

DDR3/DDR4
Memory type
DDR3
no data
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
no data
Memory bus width
64 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
1580 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
12.64 GB/s
+
Shared memory
no data

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA NVS 300, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
1x DMS-59

Technologies

The difference between Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA NVS 300 is the additional functionality.

+
Quick Sync
no data

API support

The difference in supported APIs is Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA NVS 300. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_1)
DirectX
no data
4.6
OpenGL
no data
1.1.103
Vulkan
no data
6.4
Shader Model
no data
2.1
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA NVS 300 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 or NVIDIA NVS 300 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
NVIDIA NVS 300
Death Stranding (2020) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
NVIDIA NVS 300
F1 2020 (2020) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
NVIDIA NVS 300
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 54.8 17.3 11.6
NVIDIA NVS 300
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
NVIDIA NVS 300
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

0.26% faster in synthetic tests

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 40 nm)

Advantages of NVIDIA NVS 300

Cheaper ($36 (0.3x MSRP) vs $999)

So, Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 or NVIDIA NVS 300?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 .

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 versus NVIDIA NVS 300 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA NVS 300