Intel HD Graphics 505
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Intel HD Graphics 505
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards Intel HD Graphics 505 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

805
Place in performance rating
928
no data
Value for money (0-100)
4.54
Gen. 9 Apollo Lake
Architecture
G9x
Apollo Lake GT1.5
Code name
G94
Laptop
Type
Mobile workstation
1 September 2016 (5 years ago)
Release date
14 August 2008 (13 years ago)
no data
Launch price (MSRP)
$99.95
$659
Price now
$296 (3x MSRP)
0.48
Value for money
0.04
Apollo Lake
GPU code name
NB9E-GLM2
Laptop
Market segment
Mobile workstation

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between Intel HD Graphics 505 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

144
Pipelines
48
300 MHz
Core clock speed
530 MHz
650 MHz
Boost Clock
no data
189 million
Transistor count
505 million
14 nm
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
10 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
65 Watt
11.70
Texture fill rate
12.72
230.4 gflops
Floating-point performance
127.2 gflops
18
Pipelines / CUDA cores
48
750 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
189 million
Number of transistors
505 million
10 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
65 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the Intel HD Graphics 505 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M.

PCIe 3.0 x1
Interface
MXM-HE
no data
Laptop size
large

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics Intel HD Graphics 505 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M can be seen in this section.

DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
Memory type
GDDR3
8 GB
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
64/128 Bit
Memory bus width
256 Bit
no data
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
no data
Memory bandwidth
51.14 GB/s
+
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards Intel HD Graphics 505 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between Intel HD Graphics 505 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M is the additional functionality.

+
Quick Sync
no data
no data
PureVideo HD
+
no data
PowerMizer 8.0
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is Intel HD Graphics 505 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1.97
Vulkan
no data
6.4
Shader Model
no data
2.1
OpenCL
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for Intel HD Graphics 505 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the Intel HD Graphics 505 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) Intel HD Graphics 505
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Death Stranding (2020) Intel HD Graphics 505
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
F1 2020 (2020) Intel HD Graphics 505
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Gears Tactics (2020) Intel HD Graphics 505
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Doom Eternal (2020) Intel HD Graphics 505
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 505

More pipelines (144 vs 48)

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 65 nm)

Less power consumption (10 Watt vs 65 Watt)

More maximum RAM amount (8 GB vs 1 GB)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

0.83% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($296 (3x MSRP) vs $659)

So, Intel HD Graphics 505 or NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M .

Intel HD Graphics 505 versus NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score Intel HD Graphics 505
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M