ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 630
ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 630

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards ATI Radeon Xpress 200M and Intel UHD Graphics 630. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
597
Rage 8
Architecture
Gen. 9.5
no data
Code name
Comet Lake GT2
no data
Type
Desktop
18 February 2005 (16 years ago)
Release date
1 October 2017 (4 years ago)
no data
Price now
$1009
no data
Value for money
1.00
RC410
GPU code name
Kaby-Lake-H-GT2
Laptop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between ATI Radeon Xpress 200M and Intel UHD Graphics 630 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

no data
Pipelines
184
2 MHz
Core clock speed
300 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
no data
Transistor count
189 million
130 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
0.67
Texture fill rate
26.45
no data
Floating-point performance
460.8 gflops
6
Pipelines / CUDA cores
24
350 MHz
Boost clock speed
1150 MHz
no data
Number of transistors
189 million
no data
Thermal design power (TDP)
15 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the ATI Radeon Xpress 200M and Intel UHD Graphics 630.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
None
Supplementary power connectors
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics ATI Radeon Xpress 200M and Intel UHD Graphics 630 can be seen in this section.

System Shared
Memory type
System Shared
no data
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
-
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards ATI Radeon Xpress 200M and Intel UHD Graphics 630, the size and number of monitors.

No outputs
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between ATI Radeon Xpress 200M and Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the additional functionality.

no data
Quick Sync
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is ATI Radeon Xpress 200M and Intel UHD Graphics 630. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

no data
DirectX
12 (12_1)
no data
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.1.103
no data
Shader Model
6.5
no data
OpenCL
2.1

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for ATI Radeon Xpress 200M and Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the ATI Radeon Xpress 200M or Intel UHD Graphics 630 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Death Stranding (2020) ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
Intel UHD Graphics 630
F1 2020 (2020) ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gears Tactics (2020) ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
Intel UHD Graphics 630 38.1 13.2 7.5 5.4
Doom Eternal (2020) ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of ATI Radeon Xpress 200M

16.48% faster in synthetic tests

Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 630

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 130 nm)

So, ATI Radeon Xpress 200M or Intel UHD Graphics 630?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend ATI Radeon Xpress 200M .

ATI Radeon Xpress 200M versus Intel UHD Graphics 630 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
5.0 Out of 1 CpusData Score Intel UHD Graphics 630