ATI Radeon X1650 PRO
VS
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
ATI Radeon X1650 PRO
VS
NVIDIA GeForce MX330

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards ATI Radeon X1650 PRO and NVIDIA GeForce MX330. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

not rated
Place in performance rating
415
R500
Architecture
Pascal
no data
Code name
GP108
no data
Type
Laptop
23 August 2006 (15 years ago)
Release date
20 February 2020 (1 year ago)
$200
Price now
$1079
no data
Value for money
2.58
RV535
GPU code name
N17S-LP / N17S-G3
Desktop
Market segment
Laptop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between ATI Radeon X1650 PRO and NVIDIA GeForce MX330 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

no data
Pipelines
384
600 MHz
Core clock speed
1531 MHz
no data
Boost Clock
1594 MHz
no data
Transistor count
1,800 million
80 nm
Manufacturing process technology
16 nm
no data
Power consumption (TDP)
10 Watt
2.400
Texture fill rate
38.26
no data
Pipelines / CUDA cores
384
no data
Boost clock speed
1594 MHz
330 million
Number of transistors
1,800 million
44 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
10 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the ATI Radeon X1650 PRO and NVIDIA GeForce MX330.

PCIe 1.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
None
Supplementary power connectors
None

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics ATI Radeon X1650 PRO and NVIDIA GeForce MX330 can be seen in this section.

GDDR3
Memory type
GDDR5
256 MB
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
128 Bit
Memory bus width
64 Bit
1400 MHz
Memory clock speed
7000 MHz
22.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
48.06 GB/s
no data
Shared memory
-

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards ATI Radeon X1650 PRO and NVIDIA GeForce MX330, the size and number of monitors.

2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Display Connectors
No outputs

Technologies

The difference between ATI Radeon X1650 PRO and NVIDIA GeForce MX330 is the additional functionality.

no data
Multi Monitor
+
no data
GPU Boost
+
no data
CUDA
6.1
no data
Optimus
+
no data
GameWorks
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is ATI Radeon X1650 PRO and NVIDIA GeForce MX330. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

no data
DirectX
12 (12_1)
no data
OpenGL
4.6
no data
Vulkan
1.2.131
no data
Shader Model
6.4
no data
OpenCL
1.2

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for ATI Radeon X1650 PRO and NVIDIA GeForce MX330 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the ATI Radeon X1650 PRO or NVIDIA GeForce MX330 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) ATI Radeon X1650 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 27 13 11 9
Death Stranding (2020) ATI Radeon X1650 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 33.4 14.7 13.7 13.4
F1 2020 (2020) ATI Radeon X1650 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 81 39 28 16
Gears Tactics (2020) ATI Radeon X1650 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 94.6 34.5 22.1 15.9
Doom Eternal (2020) ATI Radeon X1650 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 35.3
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of ATI Radeon X1650 PRO

71.36% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($200 vs $1079)

More maximum RAM amount (256 MB vs 2 GB)

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX330

Finer manufacturing process technology (16 nm vs 80 nm)

More memory bandwidth (48.06 GB/s vs 22.4 GB/s)

Multi Monitor

So, ATI Radeon X1650 PRO or NVIDIA GeForce MX330?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend ATI Radeon X1650 PRO .

ATI Radeon X1650 PRO versus NVIDIA GeForce MX330 performance benchmarks comparison

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score ATI Radeon X1650 PRO
0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score NVIDIA GeForce MX330