AMD Radeon R9 280
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 630
AMD Radeon R9 280
VS
Intel UHD Graphics 630

General info

The main nomenclature characteristics of video cards AMD Radeon R9 280 and Intel UHD Graphics 630. Pay attention to the position in the performance rating to choose the best one.

237
Place in performance rating
597
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Gen. 9.5
Tahiti
Code name
Comet Lake GT2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
4 March 2014 (7 years ago)
Release date
1 October 2017 (4 years ago)
$279
Launch price (MSRP)
no data
$305 (1.1x MSRP)
Price now
$1009
reference
Design
no data
10.12
Value for money
1.00
Tahiti
GPU code name
Kaby-Lake-H-GT2
Desktop
Market segment
Desktop

Technical specs

Choose the best graphics card between AMD Radeon R9 280 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 based on manufacturing process, power consumption, and base frequency and overclocking potential of the GPU.

1792
Pipelines
184
no data
Core clock speed
300 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
4,313 million
Transistor count
189 million
28 nm
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
200 Watt
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
104.5
Texture fill rate
26.45
3,344 gflops
Floating-point performance
460.8 gflops
1792
Pipelines / CUDA cores
24
933 MHz
Boost clock speed
1150 MHz
4,313 million
Number of transistors
189 million
200 Watt
Thermal design power (TDP)
15 Watt

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Additional technical information, does not greatly affect the performance rating when comparing the AMD Radeon R9 280 and Intel UHD Graphics 630.

PCIe 3.0 x16
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
275 mm
Length
no data
1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin
Supplementary power connectors
no data
PCIe 3.0
Bus support
no data

Memory

Graphics card memory is used to store calculations. Modern software and 3D games require more and faster memory. The higher these parameters, the more productive the chip. The difference in these characteristics AMD Radeon R9 280 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 can be seen in this section.

GDDR5
Memory type
System Shared
3 GB
Maximum RAM amount
no data
384 Bit
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
1250 MHz
Memory clock speed
no data
240 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
no data
no data
Shared memory
+

Video outputs and ports

The difference between the interfaces and ports of video cards AMD Radeon R9 280 and Intel UHD Graphics 630, the size and number of monitors.

2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Display Connectors
No outputs
1
Eyefinity
no data
+
HDMI
no data
-
DisplayPort support
no data

Technologies

The difference between AMD Radeon R9 280 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the additional functionality.

-
AppAcceleration
no data
1
CrossFire
no data
1
FreeSync
no data
+
HD3D
no data
1
LiquidVR
no data
-
PowerTune
no data
1
TressFX
no data
+
TrueAudio
no data
-
ZeroCore
no data
+
DDMA audio
no data
-
Enduro
no data
+
UVD
no data
no data
Quick Sync
+

API support

The difference in supported APIs is AMD Radeon R9 280 and Intel UHD Graphics 630. Hardware support (API) is not considered in synthetic benchmarks and performance tests.

DirectX® 12
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
+
Vulkan
1.1.103
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
-
Mantle
no data

Gaming performance

Select form the list the required name to identify gaming performance for AMD Radeon R9 280 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 graphics cards. The result shows how fast the game will run and whether it can be run on this computer. The different monitor resolutions – from low to 4K – are used for testing. Find out is the AMD Radeon R9 280 or Intel UHD Graphics 630 good for gaming.


low
1280x720
med.
1920x1080
high
1920x1080
ultra
1920x1080
QHD
2560x1440
4K
3840x2160
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Death Stranding (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
Intel UHD Graphics 630
F1 2020 (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gears Tactics (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
Intel UHD Graphics 630 38.1 13.2 7.5 5.4
Doom Eternal (2020) AMD Radeon R9 280
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend
5 Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
May Stutter – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards stutter, the game is likely to show a low frame rate. There will be some lags.
30 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 25 frames per second (fps)
40 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 35 frames per second (fps)
60 Fluent – According to the results of benchmarks the game should run at 58 frames per second (fps)
May Run Fluently – Insufficient data. Similar graphics cards show a smooth frame rate, comfortable for the game.
? Uncertain – Graphics cards testing has shown that a slower card can provide a high and stable frame rate for the same operation.
Uncertain – The work of the video card in the game is still being studied. Interpolation among analogs is not possible.
The value depicts the average frame rate. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.

Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280

20.19% faster in synthetic tests

Cheaper ($305 (1.1x MSRP) vs $1009)

More pipelines (1792 vs 184)

Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 630

Finer manufacturing process technology (14 nm vs 28 nm)

Less power consumption (15 Watt vs 200 Watt)

So, AMD Radeon R9 280 or Intel UHD Graphics 630?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, we recommend AMD Radeon R9 280 .

AMD Radeon R9 280 versus Intel UHD Graphics 630 performance benchmarks comparison

Overall benchmark performance

User rating

0.0 Out of 0 CpusData Score AMD Radeon R9 280
5.0 Out of 1 CpusData Score Intel UHD Graphics 630